High performing teams produce some of UNL Extension's most outstanding educational experiences. Most team references suggest that 1) commitment to a common vision, 2) individual accountability to the team, and 3) the right people (and skill set) are essential to successful teams. The book, "The Wisdom of Teams" by Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith, suggests those three attributes are fundamental building blocks essential to High Performing Team.
So has your Extension team achieved a “Commitment to a Common Vision”? The following diagnostic questions may provide insights to the performance of your own Extension Team and opportunities for improvement.
- Meaningful Purpose or Outcome
- Are team members passionate about this outcome? Do the outcomes belong to the team and not just defined by a leader or administrator?
- Do team members connect their own success to the team’s purpose?
- Specific Goals
- Has the team defined specific goals that are simple? Realistic? Measureable?
- Will these specific goals lead to a concrete set of team work-products?
- Common Approach (implementation plan)
- Is the working plan for implementing these goals concrete (all team members know what will happen)?
- Does approach involve all team members in meaningful contributions?
- General
- Do team members believe that they are actively engaged in developing the team’s vision?
- Do all members articulate the team’s purpose, goals,
and approach in the same way?
Another perspective regarding Successful Teams -
ReplyDeleteIn Relation to the Psychological Types of Teams and Their Members - Teams that have complex tasks need the talents of different types of people:
- Introverts for looking deeply into the issues;
- Extraverts for making the social contacts needed in taking action;
- Sensing types for knowing the facts and realities needed for planning, and the details for implementation;
- Intuitive types for seeing the big picture and coming up with new and innovative possibilities;
- Thinking types for spotting flaws and inconsistencies of a plan;
- Feeling types for seeing the human side and for persuasion;
- Judging types for systematic process, organization and decisiveness;
- Perceiving types for openness and understanding, and flexibility when the system breaks down.
This perspective is taken from: Hirsh, E., Hirsh, K., and Krebs Hirsh, S., 2003. Introduction to Type and Teams, and CPP, Inc., Mountain View CA. And, Predictions about Teams, 1997, CAPT, Inc., Gainsville, FL.